Climategate: So The Raw Data WAS Manipulated

December 17, 2009 / 9:50 am • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Latest charge: The CRU cooked data from Russia, specifically and especially Siberia.Absolutely shocking:

They specifically state that lack of measurement is not the cause. If they claim the full set of Russian data does NOT support global warming, imagine how different the bright red dot over Russia would look. Again the accusation is completely believable, yet is completely unverifiable because CRU has refused to release the data. This data and code release is the subject of illegal blocking of FOIA’s is one of the keys in the Climategate emials. We need to know the list of stations used and we must have copies of the raw data.

This is a very powerful accusation, which if true could change much about the climate science debate. Many papers are based on this dataset which has the highest trend of the major ground datasets.

More here.

I’m thinking that the Russians may have been behind this info leak after all.

Posted in Environmentalism • Isms
Tags:

  1. One Response to “Climategate: So The Raw Data WAS Manipulated”

  2. aposematic
    March 2 2010 / 8:57 pm
    Reply

    I know this just has to be all over the NYT front page…right?

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.