Andrew Breitbart “The Pulitzer Of Our Time”–Updated
September 20, 2009 / 12:10 pm • By Dr. Melissa ClouthierAndrew Breitbart promises a new story from “left field” not related to ACORN when talking to Michael Savage–coming this week:
Via Hotair.com
Also, President Obama, former lawyer for ACORN, says that he’s not aware of ACORN activities. Michelle Malkin has the whole transcript and more, but here’s a snort-worthy snippet:
STEPHANOPOULOS: How about the funding for ACORN?
OBAMA: You know, it’s — frankly, it’s not really something I’ve followed closely. I didn’t even know that ACORN was getting a whole lot of federal money.
This man is pathological. There is no reason to lie about the connection at this point. It only makes the story worse, for President Obama. Admit that an ACORN connection existed in the distant past and move on, but no, he has to tell untruths.
Update:
Oh, and don’t believe the lies about the MSM not knowing about ACORN. They knew. More.
Here is my story about the New York Times spiking the ACORN story right before the election from March 19 of this year.
UPDATED Again:
Over in the Greenroom, Patrick Ishmael is doing some guessing. Is it Buffy Wicks?
Patterico wonders if the story is the NEA.
By the way, Breitbart did seem to have it mind to nail the media from the outset; this September 7th column tipped his hand, but no one I know of picked up on his hints.
He warned the media. They ignored the warning.
Kaus says of Breitbart, he ” didn’t realize he’d have the course of events all planned out like Hari Seldon in Foundation. … “. Well. Any less planning and it would get no attention. A random, accurate, insightful story doesn’t penetrate the mainstream media as we’ve all witnessed. They can’t even be bothered to report a well-documented VISUAL story where the evidence is obvious. Why would they note a story not gradually planned?
Best lefty comment found at Sadly No regarding the story:
possible criminal suspicions against Acorn
THERE’S NOTHING THERE YOU FUCKWADS!!!!
*ahem* though that sure as hell didn’t stop them in ‘92.
WHY. THE. FUCK. are we letting these shithead assclown morans run our politics? THEY LOST. They should find a dark corner somewhere and wank off to “Atlas Shrugged” and let the rest of us get on with business.
And I would suggest to the Left, that if President Obama is looking at appointing a Special Prosecutor for this, that there is indeed much more here and that the non-stop investigation will help obscure the truth not reveal it. Jammie Wearing Fool notes: “The left loved Patrick Fitzgerald when he went after Scooter Libby. It would be curious to see their reaction if he were to be the one probing ACORN.”
H/T Don Surber
5 Responses to “Andrew Breitbart “The Pulitzer Of Our Time”–Updated”
September 21 2009 / 6:15 am
Reply
Looks like this is going to be another entertaining week. Popcorn anyone?
September 21 2009 / 8:00 am
Reply
There is an actual downside to him bringing up more Dimocrat’s Scandals. It will mean The O will want to come on TV more and do more CYA speeches…./cry!!!!
September 21 2009 / 2:21 pm
Reply
Here’s a worthwhile experiment for The One to try: Stay in the White House, do your job however well you are able to do it (Michelle can probably give you some Clif notes on that), and don’t appear in public or on any TV network for one full month. Check your approval ratings when you begin this experiment and again when you conclude same. My guess is that your approvals will be vastly improved. Your absence improves our opinion of you considerably.
September 23 2009 / 5:10 am
Reply
Andrew Breitbart has WAY MORE credibility than the MSM, and if he says it, I believe it.
Can’t wait, popcorn futures are up…
Hilarity ensues…