Blood Tests By Cops? No. Twitter By Surgeons? Yes.

September 14, 2009 / 1:20 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

A tale of two technologies. I don’t care that blood draws by cops help stop drunk driving, I don’t want a cop near a needle, period. Too many things can go wrong.

What about surgeons giving updates from the surgery? Coolness. Doctors take turns, nurses help open and close, and in between a surgeon can update on progress. Since I’ve been in the waiting room too many times to note, I must say that the waiting…often hours…is just so stress inducing. Being told that the first phase is done and went well or there has been some trouble as the tumor was more invasive than expected, might or might not be welcome news, but the worst part is not knowing.

  1. One Response to “Blood Tests By Cops? No. Twitter By Surgeons? Yes.”

  2. mer
    September 15 2009 / 6:34 am
    Reply

    They can forcefully take blood? Sure get three officers to hold me down while a fourth tries to stick a needle in my hand or arm? Sounds like excessive force to me and lots of potential for actual injury. Chain of evidence and sample storage also sounds like a problem.

    You want a blood test instead of a breath test? Break the person’s nose and take them to the hospital.

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.