President Obama: The Black President Rather Than The American President Who Happens To Be Black

July 23, 2009 / 10:15 am • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Lynn Sweet’s question about the Henry Gate’s arrest (white officers arrested a black Harvard scholar breaking into his own home) at the press conference seemed coordinated and purposeful and at first glance, strange. The press conference was regarding nationalized health care, why would a reporter talk about the Henry Gate’s arrest? As Yuri says over at the National Review, normally, a president would say:

It’s the kind of question to which a president would normally reply with something like: “That’s a local police matter, I don’t know the details and I know it will be worked out responsibly,” and move along. Obama gave a lengthy review of the facts, called the police officers involved stupid, and implied they are also liars. Very odd behavior for a president.

My take was that President Obama wanted to talk about race in a grand way. He wanted to remind the country that his presidency was historic and historic changes (i.e. health care legislation that is a human right like racial equality is a human right) needed to happen for a historic time. While I believe the president choosing to talk about this was an error in judgment, I certainly don’t believe the topic was accidental or a simple “gaffe”.

The Politico’s Ben Smith sees a pattern but I think he missed the big idea that Obama was trying to convey:

His dryness was all the more striking by contrast with the press conference’s conclusion, when he suddenly re-engaged with a question that he’s spent much of his life mulling — race, in the form of the arrest of a black Harvard professor.

The appearance was striking by its absence of a move that’s long characterized Obama’s political career: When in trouble, go big. Faced with a crisis of confidence or with a political furor, he’s repeatedly shown an ability to rise above the storm and to broaden the playing field, as when he turned a flap over his pastor into a meditation on race in America.

Now, facing his hardest test as president, Obama chose to go small.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25320.html#ixzz0M5sZOcek

President Obama intended for this last question to be big and general and capture a huge theme. I’m quite sure the president wanted to start a discussion of race. I’m quite sure President Obama is furious about what he perceives as systemic injustice–both with regards to race and to health care.

Americans are not fully realized. Fully realized and civilized people recognize that socialized health care is a right, just as fully realized and civilized people recognize that all people are equal regardless of skin color. He’s making the juxtaposition but it was an oblique one because most people don’t view health care as a birth right. They view it as a benefit. They view health care as a pain to deal with that needs to be fixed–not some grand human rights issue.

President Obama also took the opportunity to focus on race specifically before knowing the facts. Clearly, he was affronted by what he perceived was a wrong that happened to his friend. Evidently, he hadn’t read the police report now scrubbed from the Boston Globe. It seemed a strange diversion at the end of a health care conversation to be talking about race, but for another professor, it was a teaching moment.

When all the facts are revealed, the event could well be a racially-motivated. Moe Lane comments:

But the encounter is anything but over. Some of Gates’s outraged colleagues said the run-in proves that even in a liberal enclave like Harvard Square, even with someone of Gates’s accomplishments, a black man is a suspect before he is a resident.

Bolding mine, and there to highlight my sardonic observation: what do you mean, “even?” Not to be rude about it, but there ain’t no racist like a Bostonian racist*. Which is not necessarily a knock on the cop; it’s a knock on the neighbor who called the cops on Prof. Gates in the first place.

Does racism exist? Yes. Does elitism exist? Yes. (As in, “Do you know who I AM?!”)

But that all didn’t seem to be the point of President Obama’s answer. It was a broader answer,”We have lots of work to do.” That is, America is still rather a stupid place that needs to be made better by smart people. And when the smart people are listened to, racism will magically go away and health care will be perceived as a civil right and America will finally be a place to believe in.

The unintended consequence of the President’s answer to the question was that he framed himself as the black man who is President rather than the President who happens to be black, talking about health care. He started the press conference saying, “this isn’t about me” and in the end, made it all about him. And worse, made it, again, about how America is a bad place for men like him.

  1. 8 Responses to “President Obama: The Black President Rather Than The American President Who Happens To Be Black”

  2. Glynn W.
    July 23 2009 / 6:47 pm
    Reply

    Right.

    Even as you spark this discussion, the other half of the GOP is jumping up and down declaring that Barack Obama is not even a U.S. Citizen.

    Several conservative talk show hosts, members of congress, and even now a sitting Republican Senator are spreading this racist nonsense. And Obama says we have a way to go . . .

    Now, I ask you – would this slander have been tolerated for an Irish-American? a German-American? or perhaps a Polish-American?

    Answer: Not. In. A. Million. Years.

    Look at your G. Gordon Liddy make a jackass out of himself on national TV:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/23/gordon-liddy-struggles-em_n_243982.html

    Instead of trying to play “gotcha” with Obama, why don’t the spokespersons for the GOP talk about the scores of racist emails, innuendos, jokes and slander perpetrated in just the last few weeks by ACTUAL GOP OFFICIALS – instead of this garbage.

    I wonder . . .

  3. fuster
    July 23 2009 / 10:19 pm
    Reply

    Blathering, Melissa, you’re doing no more than blathering. If you read the police report, then you know that the cop did act wrongly and put his department in an indefensible position.

  4. WayneB
    July 24 2009 / 10:20 am
    Reply

    fuster – I read the report, and no, the cop did NOT act wrongly. He investigated a report of someone breaking into a home. Gates got agitated, defensive, and abusive, when all he had to do was show that he lived there.

    Instead, he launched immediately into accusations of racism, went into the arrogant, “Do you know who I am?” BS, and threatened to get the cop in trouble. All BEFORE producing ANY identification.

    Even after that, it would have all been left alone, if he had not followed the cop outside and continued his tirade out there, where he constituted a public disturbance. At that point, he got arrested.

  5. Reaganite Republican
    July 24 2009 / 10:21 am
    Reply

    Nice work Barack… with one comment you managed to alienate 75% of America.

    And anyone who has spent any amount of time in the “higher” education system knows the Professor Gates type: bitter, spiteful, bigoted racist with a position of power who felt emboldened to make a political statement.

    This is the type of Professor who would change the subject on you when you attempt to engage in a debate- or would give you a poor grade because you actually have an opinion, and done research outside of marxist texts and such. You are fooling no one, Mr Gates.

    And Mr President, is this “nuance” you’ve spoke of? “the police acted stupidly”? -please

    Obama is out to rip this country to shreds in EVERY way- who can question that such ill-advised statements are divisive… and NOT helpful? He has no idea what happened, he admitted it- and apparently doesn’t care, either… he’s picked his side.

    But back in reality, the childish and paranoid Gates completely baited the cop, who acted with admirable restraint, IMO… all he had to do is show his ID and shut up, he was treated with respect. This guy was clearly looking for a fight… and he ought to thank God he didn’t find one.

    Obama is going to destroy race relations in this country with his vengeful “get even” mentality… some messiah- Americans should have chosen a fair and sensible human being instead of this embittered nut.

  6. fuster
    July 24 2009 / 12:49 pm
    Reply

    Wayne- The cop investigated properly, arrested wrongly. He had id from Gates, knew that Gates was at home.
    Yelling at a cop is not an offense, except to civility, and the cop was without authority to make the arrest.

  7. Reggie Greene / The Logistician
    July 25 2009 / 11:05 am
    Reply

    You are absolutely correct on this one. He should have maintained his President who just happens to be black persona.

    We have three observations about the Harvard professor incident:

    1. We find it interesting that the fact that this was the professor’s home was evidently not established early on way before the dispute escalated;

    2. We find it fascinating that the versions of two members of society, who most would ordinarily view as responsible and honest citizens (this obviously does not include politicians), would vary so dramatically from a factual point of view.

    3. Finally, considering that the reading and viewing public were not present at the scene (and thus have no first hand knowledge), and that there is no video tape to our knowledge of the sequence of events and what was said, how so many have formed conclusions, and made assumptions, about who did what and who was wrong.

    There are some things which Professor Gates might have considered upon the arrival of the police, no matter how incensed he may have been.

  8. DaveR
    July 26 2009 / 3:10 pm
    Reply

    Way to speak too soon fuster – Gates ID did NOT have that address on it. Maybe you should wait for the facts before you jump to conclusions and try to slam others.

  9. WayneB
    July 27 2009 / 12:15 pm
    Reply

    When Gates kept shouting after following Crowley out onto the porch, he was creating a public disturbance. He was warned to tone it down, and when he refused to, he was arrested.

    That’s because creating a public disturbance is a crime. Since you can’t stop a public disturbance by writing a ticket, the person is arrested, so they can be removed from the scene, and the disturbance is resolved. Many times, after the person calms down, he is released with no charges, because it’s not worth the paperwork. But, if the cops don’t arrest the person, it doesn’t resolve the disturbance.

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.