BlogHer leans pretty strong to the liberal/lefty side of the blogosphere. That’s why I chose not to go. I don’t have a problem at all with the idea of a conference for women bloggers though. I am hoping to go to a Blissdom conference someday.
Considering the incredible screeching we’d hear if there was such a thing as a “bloghim” conference – this event has been something I’ve found distasteful from the inception.
Add to that the fact that I see no need for someone else to tell me how to blog and I think that covers my feelings for this gathering. I’ve managed about 4.5 years without their input so I think I have some idea of how to go about it.
I know what it takes to be one of the big bloggers. I’ve met a few of them. It takes lots and lots of hard work and a continual focus on your blog to create a base of readers who refer to your work. I don’t put anywhere near enough time in for this nor do I feel the need to do so. I blog for myself and a few (very few) nice people who stop by to read my scribbling.
Does having “equality” mean that women have to give up fellowship with each other? While we should have equal rights, we are not the same as men. We are different, and have different needs and wants. Many women want to be able to get together with other women without having men around. There is nothing wrong with that, nor would there be anything wrong with men doing the same, if they should want to.
You’re right. Equal does not mean same. I guess I just don’t feel the need to fellowship with women bloggers exclusively when I have such fun when I meet up with ALL bloggers. At the different meetups over the past year, I’ve enjoyed the fellowship with men and women.
And yes, I have special friendships with some women and men in the blog world, but gender has nothing to do with it.
In my editorial at Pajamas Media today, I talk about Sarah Palin's decision to endorse the conservative, rather than the Republican candidate and what it all means:
87% of Houstonians polled say that politicians should be held to a higher standard when it comes to rhetorical decorum. Turns out that Rahm Emmanuel has a potty-mouth and Joe Biden routinely says "f*ck".
Liz Cheney spoke at the Smart Girls Summit in Nashville--alas, I missed it. But I've seen her interviewed and she's got her daddy's smarts and her mama's grit. (Her mom is smart, too.) She was featured by the New York Times:
A persistent complaint in the male-dominated political blogosphere is the difficulty getting a woman. Guys like Ace and Allah have made their hard luck in love laments part of their schtick. Well.
Naomi Wolf defended the Muslim veil. This is something I wrote about a couple weeks ago amidst some controversy because I feel that the face covering specifically is wrong for the reasons Phylllis Chesler mentions here:
It would make sense that Feminists would oppose burqas because they are a tool of oppression for women: that is, burqas are specifically made to make a woman persona non grata. A burqa's very purpose is to hide the woman and make her invisible as an individual. She is just not there.
6 Responses to “BlogHer”
April 20 2009 / 12:48 pm
Reply
BlogHer leans pretty strong to the liberal/lefty side of the blogosphere. That’s why I chose not to go. I don’t have a problem at all with the idea of a conference for women bloggers though. I am hoping to go to a Blissdom conference someday.
April 20 2009 / 5:36 pm
Reply
Considering the incredible screeching we’d hear if there was such a thing as a “bloghim” conference – this event has been something I’ve found distasteful from the inception.
Add to that the fact that I see no need for someone else to tell me how to blog and I think that covers my feelings for this gathering. I’ve managed about 4.5 years without their input so I think I have some idea of how to go about it.
I know what it takes to be one of the big bloggers. I’ve met a few of them. It takes lots and lots of hard work and a continual focus on your blog to create a base of readers who refer to your work. I don’t put anywhere near enough time in for this nor do I feel the need to do so. I blog for myself and a few (very few) nice people who stop by to read my scribbling.
It’s enough for me.
April 20 2009 / 8:48 pm
Reply
No, and no.
Their premise is sexist.
April 21 2009 / 1:05 pm
Reply
It just seems to me that we’ve achieved equality. Women bloggers either succeed in the realm of all people or they don’t succeed.
April 21 2009 / 1:11 pm
Reply
Does having “equality” mean that women have to give up fellowship with each other? While we should have equal rights, we are not the same as men. We are different, and have different needs and wants. Many women want to be able to get together with other women without having men around. There is nothing wrong with that, nor would there be anything wrong with men doing the same, if they should want to.
Being equal does not mean being the same.
April 21 2009 / 1:15 pm
Reply
You’re right. Equal does not mean same. I guess I just don’t feel the need to fellowship with women bloggers exclusively when I have such fun when I meet up with ALL bloggers. At the different meetups over the past year, I’ve enjoyed the fellowship with men and women.
And yes, I have special friendships with some women and men in the blog world, but gender has nothing to do with it.