“We Need To Redefine Merit”…Because Standardized Testing Is Racist

March 11, 2009 / 8:32 am • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

I watched this video yesterday and got sick to my stomach. You can watch the whole thing, too, to get an idea of what is being taught at say, Harvard University. Professor Lani Guinier, at the State of the Black Union jams so many false premises and wrong-headed thinking in 10 minutes that it’s impressive. Here are a couple highlights:

“We need to redefine merit. Within each ethnic group talent is equally distributed among all people. All people have merit.”

“Diversity in problem solving groups trumps individual ability.”

Professor Guinier recommends that rather than hiring smart people, employers should look at hiring people who are dumb but answered the questions the smart people got wrong.

Since some people can’t “make the grade” the solution, then, is to make grades have no meaning. Since some people are stupid, then the goal is to find the few times they are actually smart and endure them the rest of the time–because every once in a while, they might have a novel solution.

This ten minute video encapsulates liberal philosophy. While the Professor talks about the importance of critical thinking skills, she displays an astonishing lack of them herself. Ken Blackwell says:

Guinier goes on to insult hard working students and diminish their academic success in explaining her rationale, saying, “the reason that I’m calling it racism is because it is a state of mind that is indifferent to the fact that these tests, whatever you think about them, are having a disparate impact on different populations and violating that first principal that talent is equally distributed among all groups.”

The audacity in this assertion is exceeded only in its staggering absurdity. Different people perform differently on standardized tests because people are, well, different. I may score high on tests involving history or language, but fear my expertise in higher mathematics is woefully lacking. The same holds true for those in vocational fields. An aptitude for auto mechanics doesn’t automatically translate into great skill in dental hygiene, welding, or any other trade. The facts are simple; talent is not, never has been and never will be “equally distributed among all groups,” as Guinier preposterously claims.

I had to laugh at one point. Professor Guinier disparages Barack Obama’s A+’s (assuming he got any, but whatever) saying that a person’s grades don’t guarantee how he’s going to lawyer. Well, that’s true, indeed.

What Professor Guinier aims to do is to remove all forms of defining achievement so that everyone is an achiever. She’s like Syndrome from the movie The Incredibles:

“Oh, I’m real. Real enough to defeat you! And I did it without your precious gifts, your oh-so-special powers. I’ll give them heroics. I’ll give them the most spectacular heroics the world has ever seen! And when I’m old and I’ve had my fun, I’ll sell my inventions so that *everyone* can have powers. *Everyone* can be super! And when everyone’s super–
[chuckles evilly] –no one will be.”

Success in America will be when everyone is defined as successful…then no one will be successful.

Cross-posted at Right Wing News

  1. 6 Responses to ““We Need To Redefine Merit”…Because Standardized Testing Is Racist”

  2. irishspy
    March 11 2009 / 9:22 am
    Reply

    Hmmm…. Syndrome as an icon of the end goals of American liberalism. Whoever knew The Incredibles was political commentary? :)

    BTW, Guinier achieved brief fame as a nominee for Assistant Attorney General under Clinton in 1993, but her nomination was withdrawn when her hostility to the simple “one citizen, one vote” rule became public. I think Goldber would describe her a a classic “liberal fascist.”

  3. Mat
    March 11 2009 / 9:24 am
    Reply

    Melissa,

    Welcome to the “awesomeness” of multiculturalism…

  4. Stephen Smoot
    March 11 2009 / 2:37 pm
    Reply

    Who is John Galt?

  5. Annoying Old Guy
    March 11 2009 / 2:44 pm
    Reply

    I have to strongly disagree with your view on Syndrome’s ultimate goal. I thought it very American – if someone’s better than you, improve yourself. In Syndrome’s world people would, in fact, be more successful. I, personally, am OK with that, even if it means no one is special.

    Lanier’s attempt to ignore reality through language manipulation, on the other hand, is true evil.

  6. Artruen
    March 11 2009 / 7:46 pm
    Reply

    Now why would that make you sick? Lani appears mentally ill and you should be concerned……

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Mar 11, 2009: The Enlightened Redneck » Why We Home-School, Lesson #16

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.