Diane Feinstein “Reserves The Right To Vote Against” Stimulus Bill–UPDATED
February 6, 2009 / 4:25 pm • By Dr. Melissa ClouthierIs Diane Feinstein an obstructionist?
It occurs to me that Barack Obama campaigned in language that made him sound like a small government guy. No wonder people hate the Stimulus Bill. Of course, for Feinstein, there isn’t enough taxpayer dough given out.
UPDATED:
American Pundit has far more coverage.
Where are the grown-ups?
Who is going to turn, now? Collins, Specter and Snowe wobble and will ruin the Republican brand and their fellow Republican’s careers over this.
Allah has the full Feinstein clip. Too many tax cuts, not enough spending. Told ya.
Seeing Robert Gibbs in action, Moe Lane asks if you pine for the Bush administration yet. Well, for more than a couple reasons, yes.
Axis of Right reports that North Carolina’s Kay Hagin (D–remember her? The “Satan-worshiper” who unseated Liddy Dole. Uh, yeah. North Carolina isn’t the most lib of states. Her power might be short-lived if she is perceived as a big spending Leftist.)
Ace weighs in and in and in (go follow him), he’s all over this:
Snowe and Collins need calls. Michelle Malkin calls Specter the ringleader — not sure if he’s gettable. Maybe just call him an asshole.
9 Responses to “Diane Feinstein “Reserves The Right To Vote Against” Stimulus Bill–UPDATED”
February 6 2009 / 5:10 pm
Reply
Ok Robert, it’s nice and all that the President is working on behalf of the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs.
What about the many more millions of Americans who haven’t lost their jobs, and don’t want to?
How will raising taxes and hiking spending and the national debt to unheard of levels help those Americans keep their jobs?
It won’t. It will merely pad the coffers of the government and its employees while rendering the rest of us subservient to Washington for the rest of our lives.
February 7 2009 / 2:24 pm
Reply
No to “stimulus” bill. Here’s why:
Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited ‘after-the-fact’ short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addressed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment ‘citizen’ is not sufficient. A ‘President’ MUST BE an Article 2 ‘natural born citizen’ AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.
February 9 2009 / 2:16 pm
Reply
Diane F. was just getting back at the Obamunist for picking Panetta to head the CIA without talking to her first. She is still a socialist and will follow The One, she just wants to send a message.