<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back To School Barack: Learn To Act Presidential 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/02/03/back-to-school-barack-how-to-act-presidential-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/02/03/back-to-school-barack-how-to-act-presidential-101/</link>
	<description>Information Pollination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morgan K Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/02/03/back-to-school-barack-how-to-act-presidential-101/comment-page-1/#comment-13183</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan K Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=12573#comment-13183</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s reasonable for people to expect, whether they gain weight deliberately or by other means, that the President of the United States won&#039;t be commenting on it because He&#039;s got more important things to worry about...especially if He is some kind of Christ-replacement, incarnated in mortal flesh to deliver us from evil, as is the case here.

I guess that means bloggers get to talk about things the President doesn&#039;t. Well, yeah; with great power comes great responsibility.

Regarding the surrounding himself with yes-men, I was giving the laymens&#039; reference material (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_A&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wiki&lt;/a&gt;) on Type-A and Type-B personalities a closer look, and I found the conventional wisdom made more sense than I had previously thought. I think most people misunderstand it. Type-A&#039;s are generally not &quot;secure&quot; -- the opposite is the case. Their grandiose displays of pomposity mask their internalized feelings of inadequacy. They are the guy driving the enormous or expensive set o&#039;wheels, poorly endowed within the trousers.

One of the symptoms of a poor management style, is to fill all the subordinate layers of management with Type-A&#039;s: All opinions expressed most quickly and most forcefully, must be most correct. Another classic symptom is to fill all the subordinate layers with Type-B&#039;s because you yourself are Type-A. I think the latter of those two most accurately describe the situation in our new executive branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s reasonable for people to expect, whether they gain weight deliberately or by other means, that the President of the United States won&#8217;t be commenting on it because He&#8217;s got more important things to worry about&#8230;especially if He is some kind of Christ-replacement, incarnated in mortal flesh to deliver us from evil, as is the case here.</p>
<p>I guess that means bloggers get to talk about things the President doesn&#8217;t. Well, yeah; with great power comes great responsibility.</p>
<p>Regarding the surrounding himself with yes-men, I was giving the laymens&#8217; reference material (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_A" rel="nofollow">Wiki</a>) on Type-A and Type-B personalities a closer look, and I found the conventional wisdom made more sense than I had previously thought. I think most people misunderstand it. Type-A&#8217;s are generally not &#8220;secure&#8221; &#8212; the opposite is the case. Their grandiose displays of pomposity mask their internalized feelings of inadequacy. They are the guy driving the enormous or expensive set o&#8217;wheels, poorly endowed within the trousers.</p>
<p>One of the symptoms of a poor management style, is to fill all the subordinate layers of management with Type-A&#8217;s: All opinions expressed most quickly and most forcefully, must be most correct. Another classic symptom is to fill all the subordinate layers with Type-B&#8217;s because you yourself are Type-A. I think the latter of those two most accurately describe the situation in our new executive branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F Not Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/02/03/back-to-school-barack-how-to-act-presidential-101/comment-page-1/#comment-13157</link>
		<dc:creator>John F Not Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=12573#comment-13157</guid>
		<description>Now can we say &quot;See, we told you so&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now can we say &#8220;See, we told you so&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chalmers</title>
		<link>http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/02/03/back-to-school-barack-how-to-act-presidential-101/comment-page-1/#comment-13068</link>
		<dc:creator>Chalmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=12573#comment-13068</guid>
		<description>Oh, and for what it&#039;s worth, I don&#039;t think BO said anything negative about Jessica Simpson.  He said something to the effect of, &quot;she&#039;s in a weight battle,&#039; or something similar in response to Matt saying, &quot;You were replaced by Jessica Simpson.&quot;  I am not one to defend BO, but I think he was just reading what was on the magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and for what it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t think BO said anything negative about Jessica Simpson.  He said something to the effect of, &#8220;she&#8217;s in a weight battle,&#8217; or something similar in response to Matt saying, &#8220;You were replaced by Jessica Simpson.&#8221;  I am not one to defend BO, but I think he was just reading what was on the magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chalmers</title>
		<link>http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/02/03/back-to-school-barack-how-to-act-presidential-101/comment-page-1/#comment-13067</link>
		<dc:creator>Chalmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=12573#comment-13067</guid>
		<description>I thought it was more telling when BO responded to Matt&#039;s question about his mother-in-law living with them...  She steps in to defend him from Michelle?  Does this guy even own a pair of testicles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was more telling when BO responded to Matt&#8217;s question about his mother-in-law living with them&#8230;  She steps in to defend him from Michelle?  Does this guy even own a pair of testicles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
