The MSM Saw Obsolescence Coming…..–UPDATED

January 29, 2009 / 11:13 am • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Should the New York Times go non-profit? That’s a thought. Will it matter if they do? I’m not sure.

From Gizmodo (who has a great video):

The piece is about the earliest days of digital media, when the lucky few home computer users could view content from a handful of prominent papers on their “television screens” by dialing into their CompuServe Information Service with their rotary phones.

It’s interesting to see how many people involved in the project at the Examiner and elsewhere had a resolutely realistic take on the whole thing, assuming, despite how clunky current technologies were, that digital media was the unavoidable future—a sentiment that has since lost favor in newsrooms, now that it’s actually coming to pass

Yes, well, it’s one thing to know you’re obsolete in theory. It’s another thing, to actually experience it.

UPDATED:

Via Instapundit, there IS life after losing a newspaper job.

Cross-posted at Right Wing News

  1. 2 Responses to “The MSM Saw Obsolescence Coming…..–UPDATED”

  2. RightGirl
    January 29 2009 / 2:03 pm
    Reply

    Well color me shocked! I thought the NYT was already non-profit, given that it hasn’t made any profits for some time..

    RG

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Jan 29, 2009: Vodkapundit » They Don’t Like Profits Anyway

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.