Boring Bush and Obama Drama–UPDATED

Back in the old days, President George W. Bush woke up early, put on a suit with jacket, got his briefings, had his meetings, made tough decisions–many of which ticked off the left and the press, exercised, ate peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for snacks and went to bed at a reasonable time. He would meet privately with soldier’s families, write them letters, agonize with their loss and express gratitude for sacrifice. He would stumble with his words and not let the discontent of those with less information at their disposal to sway him from decisions that he thought best for the country. He made a lot of people angry–both friend and foe alike. He disappointed people. Still, he was a grown-up. Adult.

I don’t know if Barack Obama will be an adult at the helm or not. It’s too soon to tell. But this much is already clear: there has been a lot of drama surrounding President Obama’s “associations” and “friends” and now staff and even, himself. So much so that had President Bush had the same sort of drama, I think that his head would already be on a pike. For example:

Rod “Blago” Blagojevich and Rahm Emmanuel Senate seat-for-sale deal in Chicago.

Obama buddy and spurned Kennedy, Caroline:

New York magazine on Paterson: “His style of governance, a dizzy mix of ingratiation and trickeration, has turned what could have been a moment of triumph — a powerful new ally in the Senate, a relationship with President Obama — into a slapstick fiasco, a fitting sequel to the way Paterson got the job in the first place.”

Why would President Obama think it is a good idea to get into a fight with Rush Limbaugh? First, Rush is a talk show host. Can you imagine GW calling out Keith Olbermann? Keith Olbermann is beneath President Bush and beneath being addressed. It would make Bush look small to even acknowledge Olbermann’s loony ravings. Ostensibly, President Barack Obama view Rush Limabaugh’s views as “loony ravings”, no? And yet, it seems not. He takes Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh’s ideas personally. Is it ego? Is it that he simply cannot imagine that any thinking person wouldn’t agree with his magnificence? Or does he believe they touch the truth and it’s uncomfortable? Either way, he gives them power by acknowledging them. Robert Stacy McCain says:

In other words, by picking this fight, Obama is getting himself into a quagmire, giving publicity to the one person who knows best how to turn that publicity into an issue-focused argument highlighting the flaws of Obama’s economic plan which, as Rush says, “anyone with a brain knows” won’t work.

Maybe President Obama’s churlish outburst, “I won” was a reinforcing statement. Evidently he needs to remind himself that he’s actually the President.

When you’re President, your advisers and associations and how you manage power matter. When you’re President, the press’s job isn’t to be your cheering section, it’s to ask questions and keep you honest (well, a few aren’t anyway). When you’re President, people will oppose you for policy reasons (shocking, in this case, but true). The force of even President Obama’s wonderful personalityishness does not equate into pink marshmallows being pooped out of unicorn butts into your Starbuck’s hot chocolate, as someone noted on Twitter.

So far, there has been a fair amount of Obama Drama. It’s not surprising, really. He has surrounded himself with the same old Democratic operatives who created a fair amount of drama the last time they skulked the hallowed halls. But more than his staff, it is Him.

Barack Obama won the Presidency not on the strength of his policies but the force of his personality. He created a cult of personality and has many devoted followers.

He managed to seem to be on all sides of an issue, so much so that super conservative evangelical friends of mine believed that Barack Obama was against abortion when every single decision he made in his past indicated exactly his current actions. Can you imagine? What a come down for all the people on all sides when they realize he was willing to say anything and allow misconceptions to stand to become President. So now, he is bound to disappoint–if only because a President has to be a grown up and choose and live with the choices.

NeoNeocon talks extensively about how the hatred for Bush comes from the same place that the loving adoration comes for Obama. She says (please read the whole piece, it is excellent):

In Tina Brown’s essay on Obama, she uses a word that struck me initially as very odd. I have highlighted it in bold in the following excerpt:

This was 9/11 in reverse. The last time I turned round and saw so many people behind me, it was that terrible day in New York when the twin towers burned and we poured out of our offices downtown and swarmed up Fifth Avenue. Then the faces were distraught. Now they were joyful. Then America had been assaulted by terror. Now it had been renewed by hope.

Ms. Brown is making the observation that the demeanor and emotional tenor of the two crowds are in contrast. Well, of course; why even bother to mention that? One was a group of people witness to a terrifying surprise attack in which thousands died; the other is watching a planned celebratory and ceremonial event.

If Brown had written “This was very different from 9/11″—indisputably true, but so what?—that statement would not have caught my attention. But the “reverse?” Did the three thousand dead spring to life? Did the planes fly out of the buildings, miraculously made whole, fires quenched? Have we returned to the innocent unawareness of 9/10?

For Brown, that return is a consummation devoutly to be wished. But Brown herself is not all that important, despite her status as a former star in the world of print journalism. The significance of her piece is that she has succinctly expressed what is behind much of the love for Obama: the depth of the need to undo 9/11 and its consequences, and to counter eight long years under the yoke of the dread and hated Bush.

Precisely. President Bush was boring old dad, the grown up. Barack Obama was new and young and fresh and different and didn’t give us bad news or tell us things we didn’t want to hear. He gives good face. He speaks smooth words. Obama is framed as being the dramatic lover. He is such a lovely rebellion–his middle name is even Hussein! How much fun is that to stick in the eye of stodgy old, boring, mean President Bush?

Time will tell if Barack Obama will end up being the President of the Left’s adolescent dreams. He will have to make decisions, after all. But don’t underestimate the desire of people to see what they want to see.

Today, the Anchoress has a must-read piece of the decisions President Barack Obama is making and what those decisions mean. That’s assuming anyone is paying attention and/or cares. Sometimes people just want a little drama to distract them from the reality of life. So far, President Obama is giving people exactly what they want.

UPDATED:

More on engaging Rush Limbaugh and the debacle of Republican leadership from The Radioequalizer:

After a rough start for the Obamists this week, the last thing they want is a viable, effective opposition movement. Rush, Sean and others provide hope that America can be saved from this budding dictator and his cultist followers.

But as the new regime oversteps its bounds, it is far more likely to elevate talk hosts to heights they’ve never before seen, proving Obama is truly a rank amateur.

Ann Althouse also notes Obama’s call-out calling it an “alpha” moment. Perhaps Rush thinks so too, judging by his response:

IN THE COMMENTS: Jason says:

The moment I heard Obama said those things about Limbaugh I went out and subscribed to Limbaugh’s 24/7 service (giving him money). And sometimes Limbaugh makes me angry, but now that the government is against him he has to be cool. Like cigarettes or machine guns or heck, even drugs.

AND: Limbaugh responds in writing, kind of screwing up the suspense…

[Obama] is hoping that these Republicans will also publicly denounce me and thus marginalize me…. To make the argument about me instead of his plan makes sense from his perspective. Obama’s plan would buy votes for the Democrat Party, in the same way FDR’s New Deal established majority power for 50 years of Democrat rule, and it would also simultaneously seriously damage any hope of future tax cuts….

Here is Rule 13 of Alinksy’s Rules for Radicals:

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Oh, there will be fireworks, Monday, to be sure. But I think Robert Stacy McCain’s point still stands. It is a mistake to attempt to distract this way. The “war” will draw attention TO the very issue Obama is trying to obfuscate.

Yes, Obama calling out Rush is a mistake. It was just one of many misplays in his first week in office.

Posted in America • Mind • Political Animals
Tags: BDS • Obama • Psychology