Moral Equivalence In Action

January 14, 2009 / 1:33 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

So my sister takes me to her place of employment. It’s winter break, and unlike in the United States, Australians just take off for a couple weeks through the holidays. The few people at the office the fam and I get to meet. My sister reminds us to behave, to be gracious and introduce ourselves if, for some reason, she forgets an employee’s name since she’s still relatively new there, and to keep our hands to ourselves. She did not explicitly tell me to not talk politics. Her mistake.

Everything goes smoothly. Pleasantries exchanged hither and thither. We occupy ourselves without breaking anything while she chats with a colleague about some issue. And then we go to leave. On our way out, we bid adieu to the temporary receptionist.

“Oh, I remember you. You’re the BBC sister,” says she–barely concealed scorn in her voice. My sister told her colleagues that I’d be doing U.S. election coverage for the BBC. Unlike in the U.S. where no one watches the BBC so my little foray into punditry went unnoticed, in Australia, everyone watches the BBC. So while I’ve never met her co-workers, they’ve “met” me because the TVs were on all day at work and my mug was there, too, with my politics on full display.

That’s me.

“Yes, we had our TVs on everywhere and saw you.” She didn’t say it like it was a good thing. Time to change the topic.

Why aren’t you on vacation?

“I’m taking my five weeks [Australia's only rival for labor cushiness is France] altogether.”

How nice. Where are you going?

“Iran and Syria.”

My face couldn’t hide my shock.

“Oh, it’s safe,” she assured me. “The travel company wouldn’t take us if it wasn’t safe. It’s not like they’ll take us to the border of Iraq or anything.”

Now, if I had more restraint, I would have just let that little slice of silly go, but I didn’t have much restraint and I didn’t like her attitude to begin with. I could feel my sister’s anxiety rise next to me. She psychically sent signals screaming, “DON’T SAY ANYTHING! DON’T SAY ANYTHING! LET IT GO!” I ignored them and smiled grandly at the receptionist.

I think you’d be safer in Iraq, actually.

The receptionist launched. “It’s not like I’m stupid. I’ve been to Libya and it was wonderful. Syria and Iran are beautiful countries. It’s perfectly safe.”

My sister interceded,”I hope you have a wonderful time! We better get going we have a long day ahead of us.”

Before this infernal woman ever talked about the loveliness of the Islamic dictatorships in question, I disliked her. I don’t like that I sometimes dislike people without any evidence to dislike them–or no conscious evidence. Maybe it was her hauteur, her territorial set, her mouth turned in a curled snarl. I don’t know. But I do know that there are some people that I inexplicably like immediately and some I don’t and that it rarely feels rational and it rarely changes with more actual evidence.

I spent some time thinking about the exchange because it bothered me that I allowed this woman to affect my blood pressure. The foundation of my irritation was the woman’s determined moral equivalence. She clearly thought I was a close-minded rube while she was an open-minded woman of the world. She had been to these places and the countries weren’t evil. They were misunderstood. Not only that, but democracy is overrated. It’s so annoying how Westerners, Americans especially, think their way is a better way. Who are they to decide what’s better for other people?

And you know what I think? I think America and Western countries are objectively better, you moron. In Iran this week, guys were stoned to death for supposedly committing adultery. Iran is the country that hangs supposedly gay, underage men. Syria is the country clandestinely building nuclear bombs and then blaming Israel for “planting evidence.” Iran and Syria support and arm Hamas and Hezbollah whose explicit goal is to destroy Israel.

If there is a way that these regimes is misunderstood, it’s by the useful idiots who want to minimize the risk they present to the human ideals of liberty, self-determination and life. A Westerner may be safe in Cuba, Iran, Syria, Libya, China, Saudi Arabia or elsewhere in dictatorial states, but their own people aren’t. That would be a major difference between a smug secretary enjoying her five week vacation in thug states. She can go home when she wants, how she wants, with whom she wants and believe how she wants. The citizens in the backward nations of Syria and Iran have no such luxury. That she can’t see this demonstrates a callous disregard for her fellow man and contempt for her own freedom that has been bought and continues to be paid for with blood and treasure.

The moral equivalence crowd can move to and rot in these despotic regimes they so aggrandize. It would be better than destroying their own countries from within.

Cross-posted at RightWingNews

  1. 10 Responses to “Moral Equivalence In Action”

  2. Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg
    January 14 2009 / 2:01 pm
    Reply

    You know what? Let the Aussie hang herself. Happily, the Left has chosen to be on the wrong side of history. If they want to delude themselves with the notion that Islam poses no threat their way of life, so be it.

    We’ll hear how she feels about Islam in ten years when she’s subject to sharia.

  3. david foster
    January 14 2009 / 4:39 pm
    Reply

    BBC coverage?…how come you haven’t provided a link for your Devoted Readers??

  4. Robert Arvanitis
    January 14 2009 / 5:14 pm
    Reply

    On the “instant dislike” thing – trust your instincts. Humans evolved in small groups, where mutual trust was vital to survive, as was the ability to detect cheaters.

    Doubt that it works? How many times have you ever felt that reaction, and been proven wrong, versus having it turn out to be correct?!

  5. TheBigHenry
    January 14 2009 / 11:36 pm
    Reply

    These dictatorial states are similar to New York — perhaps a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live there.

    It would be nice if all the useful idiots would move to one of these places. That way we wouldn’t have to throw up so much.

  6. Jason
    January 15 2009 / 12:21 am
    Reply

    Liberals…they’re always open-minded except when it comes to a sensible point of view.
    http://www.rightklik.net/

  7. Trish
    January 15 2009 / 11:48 am
    Reply

    The whole “open-minded” idea that democracy isn’t right for people of other countries and cultures is really a veiled claim of racial superiority. Sure,”we” can handle it, but “they” can’t, poor pathetic primitives that they are.

    Don’t be defensive when you come up against this attitude. Treat it with the contempt it deserves.

  8. Col. Bunny
    January 15 2009 / 12:07 pm
    Reply

    ” . . . demonstrates a callous disregard for her fellow man and contempt for her own freedom that has been bought and continues to be paid for with blood and treasure.”

    I like that. I NEVER hear my liberal friends and ultraliberal family members talk about liberty. what a jerk W and Cheney are? Yes. What a theocracy we live in? Definitely. What indifference troglodyte conservatives exhibit toward racial minorities? You bet.

    But about how liberty has been infringed by liberals, fascists, socialist wannabes? What institutions need to be preserved and strengthened to preserve liberty? Not a word. Not one. Ever.

    One family member did talk about the importance of preserving habeas corpus. For the swine in Gitmo!

  9. TheBigHenry
    January 16 2009 / 7:47 am
    Reply

    Your family sounds a lot like many others I have encountered. Their mantra is “political correctness”; their method is cherry picking; their religion is willful ignorance. Their common sense quotient is negative.

  10. dna9995
    January 18 2009 / 12:53 pm
    Reply

    What the left doesn’t understand is that Islam HATES their way of life… adultery, homosexuality, debauchery etc. Why do you think those countries call us the great satan? They feel that Christianity fails because it seems to ignore these behaviors (sins). They view Israel the same way.

    The bomb is simply the most expeditious way of dispensing with evil. It doesn’t matter how nice and diplomatic the incoming administration is. They will be confronted with an enemy that believes it is doing God’s work. Since the left has no classically religious beliefs (other than environmentalism), they will simply resist, but not destroy our enemies. The resistance will eventually evaporate, just as it has in Europe (the Upper Middle East).

    The left is a clueless, hapless, emotional, bunch of victims that are victimizing all of us into slavery to the state and eventually, sharia.

  11. LEARNED FOREVER
    February 7 2009 / 11:54 am
    Reply

    This woman is basically, what has been elected and stuffed into the White House. The latest software update — Age of Aquarious 3.0 — will bring dictators and barbarians to their knees with powerful words and phrases. Like “Make love, not war!!!”

    …it worked for such Peace Masters like, John&Oko, Mamas&Papas, 5th Dimension, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton…Monica.

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.