Obama’s Communistic Past: Is The MSM Failing To Report The Truth?–Updated

August 12, 2008 / 11:34 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Today, Barack Obama received the enthusiastic endorsement of the Communist Party USA. Here is their hope:

If Obama’s candidacy represented nothing more than the spark for this profound initiative to unite the working class and defeat the pernicious influence of racism, it would be a transformative candidacy that would advance progressive politics for the long term.

Meanwhile, what of Obama’s connection to communism? If there were one, would the mainstream media report it? Cliff Kincaid has a must-read piece over at Accuracy in Media where he discusses the implications of the non-reporting of Edwards affair and it’s implications for the non-reporting of anything negative about Obama:

The implication of the Edwards scandal is that, if ABC News’s top investigative reporter could take Edwards’ side, without any serious checking of the facts, then other candidates may be concealing scandals and hoping and planning to get away with it. That is certainly the case with Obama, who is far more of a media favorite than Edwards ever was and has, with the help of the influential Associated Press (AP), carefully concealed his relationship with an identified CPUSA member.

Obama’s communist connection, which he failed to disclose in his 1995 book, Dreams From My Father, by referring to Davis only as “Frank” and ignoring his communist affiliation, is a far more serious scandal than an Edwards “love child.”

If you’re reading this blog, it’s likely that you use other forms of news-gathering than the traditional media. But the vast majority of Americans only recently heard about John Edward’s affair. Would they ever hear about Obama’s communist connections? In February of this year, Cliff Kincaid noted Obama’s communist mentor:

However, through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his “poetry” and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just “Frank.”

The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What’s more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations.

Trevor Loudon, a New Zealand-based libertarian activist, researcher and blogger, noted evidence that “Frank” was Frank Marshall Davis in a posting in March of 2007.

Obama’s communist connection adds to mounting public concern about a candidate who has come out of virtually nowhere, with a brief U.S. Senate legislative record, to become the Democratic Party frontrunner for the U.S. presidency. In the latest Real Clear Politics poll average, Obama beats Republican John McCain by almost four percentage points.

You have not heard about these connections in the MSM. Don’t expect to. But it is important to recognize two things:

1. Given the media climate, it is possible for a candidate to receive no scrutiny until it’s too late.
2. Obama, because he is adored by the media, will receive less scrutiny than even an average Democrat.

It is possible that in today’s biased climate, that an unexamined and inexperienced candidate could achieve the highest elected office in America and most influential leadership position in the free world. That is disturbing to contemplate.

Update:
Fausta Wertz writes and will be talking on BlogTalkRadio about Obama’s communist tendencies now–specifically his abortion position, which is strikingly like communistic regime practices.

Cross-posted at RightWingNews.com

  1. 5 Responses to “Obama’s Communistic Past: Is The MSM Failing To Report The Truth?–Updated”

  2. Headless Unicorn Guy
    August 13 2008 / 12:50 pm
    Reply

    Is the MSM Failing to Report the Truth?

    doubleplusungood refs doubleplusunevents.
    memhole.

    Truth IS what the MSM says it is, Comrades.
    Ees Party Line, Comrades.

  3. Marki Kaleokualoha Davis
    August 14 2008 / 5:00 am
    Reply

    A scandal requires wrongdoing. Obama’s relationship with Davis was not a scandal because it did not involve wrongdoing.

    Besides, They have it wrong about Frank Marshall Davis. Edgar Tidwell, whom AIM’s Cliff Kincaid cites as “an expert on the life and writings of Davis,” demolishes right-wing misrepresentation of Davis’s radical influence in one simple paragraph:

    “Although my research indicates that Davis joined the CPUSA as a “closet member” during World War II, there is no evidence that he was a Stalinist, or even a Party member before WWII. Further, to those attempting to make the specious stand for the concrete, there is no evidence that he instructed Barack Obama in communist ideology. Frank Marshall Davis did NOT believe in overthrowing the USA. He was committed to what the nation professed to be. For him, communism was primarily an intellectual vehicle to achieve a political end-a possible tool for gaining the constitutional freedoms of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ALL Americans.” (See http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/Kaleokualoha)

    (Oops! Typo! Make the author Mark Kaleokualoha Davis, not “Marki”)

  4. William Bennett
    August 17 2008 / 5:09 pm
    Reply

    For years the American Communist Party nominated its own candidates for president (anyone remember Gus Hall?). Yet Democrats were smeared for years with the “Communist” brand, even though the Communists had a Communist candidate. On the other hand, what party does (or did….not sure of his current status) Klansman David Duke belong to?? The GOP. Whether or not they explicitly endorse a candidate, it doesn’t take a genius to know which party enjoys the support of right wing groups like the KKK, the John Birch Society, the American Nazi Party, etc.

  5. Cynic 13
    August 24 2008 / 10:55 pm
    Reply

    Really? Try these websites for a reality check…

    http://www.politico.com

    http://www.factcheck.org

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Aug 13, 2008: Nõnna kirja on pandud » Mis on ühist kommunistidel ja obamistidel?

Post a Comment

But Before You Say That…

  • Comments that are inappropriate, rude, completely stupid, or obviously meant to bait others into a flame war may be deleted.  If that happens to you and you want to throw a tantrum about “free speech,” do it on your own blog.  Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face without the shield of anonymity, don't say it here.
  • If you are a new commenter or are using a new e-mail address, your comment will go to moderation.  Even regular commenters get stuck in moderation sometimes.  Please be patient; your comment will be published as soon as I can get to it.
  • Comments that will never get published are those that are posted under the name “anonymous” and those using an obviously fake e-mail address.